Talking Right, Walking Wrong: Global Environmental Negotiations and Unsustainable Environmental Consumption
Luke Amadi1, Prince Igwe1, Mina Ogbanga2
Citation : Luke Amadi, Prince Igwe, Mina Ogbanga, Talking Right, Walking Wrong: Global Environmental Negotiations and Unsustainable Environmental Consumption International Journal of Research in Environmental Science 2016, 2(3) : 24-38
The persistent problems of deleterious environmental consumption by the industrialized societies despite global environmental negotiations bring to bear the need for a critical reappraisal of novel trends in environmental sustainability and ecological discourse. The paper interrogates the plausibility of the negotiations in providing a cutting edge sustainable development agenda. Using tools of analysis from secondary data, a relational content analysis (RCA) methodology is deployed to operationalize global environmental negotiations and summits between the periods 1970 to 2015 to identify salient gaps with respect to implementation. Findings from the study suggest that most of the negotiations and resolutions are not legally bidding which vitiate the level of commitment of the high income countries. For instance, the argument from Agenda 21-that all stakeholders should adopt some level of sustainable environmental consumption has been minimally enforced by the industrialized societies. The study made some policy recommendations that suggest the urgency of a shift from negotiation to enforcement.