Soft Food Paradox: Cost Analysis of Food Leftovers and Preferences in Chronic & Acute Patients
Dhini1,Utari DI2
Copyright : © 2017 . This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This article aims to identify cost of soft food leftovers among chronic and acute patients – a paradox, given the sufficient nutrition necessary these patients face. This research is analytic descriptive with cross sectional research design with the subjects of the study the 14-64 years old patients who had been treated for 1 day (n = 34). The leftover of the lunch was measured using the Comstock method. The remaining lunch costs are derived from the cost of remaining unhealthy soft foods and Fisher’s Exact Test was used. Length of stay, type of disease, leftovers of staple food, animal side dishes, vegetable side dishes, vegetable, and fruits are considered as the causes of soft food leftovers. However, the result indicates that no significant association found between the soft foods leftovers with the type of disease, the length of stay and vegetable side dishes. But the significant association exists in leftovers of staple foods, animal side dishes, vegetables and fruits. With the average lunch leftovers in a day is 27.64%, the cost of soft foods at lunch lost a day Rp. 1,871.92 / patient, then the cost of food leftovers in a year is Rp. 673.891,64 / patient. Since most government hospitals in Indonesia are low-b udget, any behavioral change in this area is likely to have a considerable impact in maintaining the operation cost.
leftovers, Length of stay, Disease types, Cost of food leftover,Nutrition and Growth
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results And Discussion
Food leftovers were both dietary and non-diet foods consisting of staple foods, animal side dishes, vegetable side dishes, vegetables, and fruit where observation results obtained patients' leftovers varied in each type. The food leftovers were then grouped into 2 types: high if the percentage of food waste is > 25% and low if the percentage of the remaining food is ≤ 25%. Under that category, 61.76% of staple food had high leftovers, Table2. Relationship between Type of Diseases and Soft Food Leftovers.55.88% of animal side dishes had low leftovers, 55.82 % of vegetable side dishes had low leftovers, 64.71 % of vegetable had high leftovers and 85.29 % of fruit had low leftovers.
Nutritional value of food leftover were then calculated to seek how much nutrient was wasted by calculating the nutritional value of the patient's food waste. The average nutritional needs of lunch for each patient is the energy of 478.39 kcal, protein 28.09 grams, fat 14.05grams and carbohydrates 79.73 grams. From the research results obtained, the average nutrient wasted every lunch in a day per person was for energy 104.79 kcal, 6.71 grams of protein, 3.07 grams of fat and 27.05 grams of carbohydrate. This way, the amount of nutrient supplied for energy was only (478. 39 kcal - 104.79 kcal) = 373.6 kcal which means only 78% of the total kcal or less 22 % of need. By the same token it is found that the protein is less 24%, fat is 22% and carbohydrate is 33%.The cost of remaining soft food was then calculated by converting from the weight of the gram that has been estimated using the visual estimates of the 6-point Comstock scale (1982) into raw weight then converted to gross weight then finally it is converted into Indonesian currency (Rupiah).
The cost of lunch per person in a day according to the group that has the highest price was on the fruit = Rp. 4.792,86, - and the lowest cost was on the vegetable side = Rp. 872, 03, -. The cost of lunch lost per person in a day according to group known was on the animal side dishes = Rp. 841.96, - and the least wasted cost was on a vegetable side dishes that is Rp. 98.03. Once added, the total cost of meal lost in a day is Rp. 1,871,92, per person - and the calculation in a year will be obtained cost of eating wasted per person is Rp. 673,891.64, -. Based on the results of Fisher's Exact Test statistics it is known that there is no significant relationship between patient's disease type with the leftovers of main food, animal side dishes, vegetable side dishes, vegetable and fruit as p-value is > 0.05.
The presence of food leftovers is likely to occur because the patient has a high level of stress either caused by the illness being suffered or the medical therapy obtained resulting in decreased appetite, physical activity and altered mental condition (Almatsier, 1992).
The more influential factor is the presence of digestive tract disorders that will affect the appetite. This is confirmed by the results of research Dwiyanti & Hadi (2003) indicating that there is influence of gastrointestinal symptoms on food intake of patients during hospitalization. Symptoms of this gastrointestinal disorder include nausea, vomiting, bloating, no appetite and diarrhea. This results in the large amount of food that patients do not consume. Thus, one of the causes of food waste is a disease factor suffered by the patient.
Furthermore, the results of this study are in line with the research of Ariefuddin et.al (2009) showing there is no significant relationship between the leftovers of the animal side dishes, vegetable side dishes, vegetables and fruits to the type of patient illness. But this research finds out that for main food has a significant relationship with the type of disease. The possibility of no relation to the leftovers of the main food, animal side dishes, vegetable side dishes, vegetables and fruits with type of disease because there are other causes that are more influential which is the appetite of the patient which according to Mukrie et. al (1990) that the eating habits of patients will affect the appetite of the patient. Serving this way patients tend to spend the food served. Conversely, if not in accordance with the patients’ eating habits, the appetite of the patient will decrease and it takes time to adjust. Moehyi (1999) also suggests that appetite will usually be strongly influenced by the condition and state of the patient because in general the patient feels sad and worried by the illness and the lack of movement due to certain diseases. This often leads to hopelessness that eventually causes the patient to lose appetite. The second factor is the food served tends to occur repetition of the material in the adjacent period. For example, in vegetables are carrots and long beans and proved in this study that most of the remaining food is vegetables. This is in line with the study of Hall et.all (2011) stated that vegetables is also the most satiated menu of patients (47.10%) and fruit is the least food left by the patient (11.07%). The types of foodstuffs used and the way of processing should vary since repeated use of recipes with similar processing techniques is likely to cause patient boredom. As the theory expressed by Prakoso (1991) that one type of cuisine served many times in a short time will make consumers feel bored, thus, it should be avoided repetition of materials, colors and spices. Djamaluddin et. al (2005) also has a corresponding theory that the amount of vegetable waste due to cooking techniques usually boiled that in the long term will cause a sense of boredom. Patients with long treatment period tend to memorize the food menu, type of food, taste and so on, so that if the processing is less varied it will cause boredom consequently leading to the decreased patient’s appetite and the food served is not consumed. The third factor is the existence of customs from the area which forbids to eat the menu. According to Ayoob et.al (2002), one of the factors that influence a person to choose food that is belief and superstition (food belief and food faddism). The fourth factor is the appearance of food during the distribution of food stacked so that for food items that large size sometimes become destroyed and become less attractive. This is because the trolley capacity is less appropriate with the number of patients served so that food must be stacked to be delivered simultaneously. According to the theory of Moehyi (1992) that the form of interesting food will provide a special attraction for each food presented. An interesting form of food can increase the acceptance of food so that respondents eat their food up. The more interesting the form of food, the lesser the leftovers will be.Table3. Exact Test statistics reveals that there is no significant relationship between the length of hospitalization with the rest of main food, animal side dishes, vegetable side dishes, vegetable and fruit for the p-value is > 0.05. If the food served as patients' needed but not being consumed regularly for a long time, it will cause the deficiency of nutrients leading to hospital malnutrition (Soegih,1998).
Djamaluddin et al. (2005) states that the longer the day of treatment, the rest of the food, especially on vegetable side dishes and vegetable will be more and more filed up. The large number of vegetable and vegetable side dishes due to the boiled cooking techniques that in the long term causes boredom as patients experiencing long treatment period tend to memorize the food menu, type of food, taste and so on that if the processing is less varied will cause boredom that consequently the patient's appetite is reduced and the food served is not eaten up.In this study, none of the main food, animal side dishes, vegetable side dishes, vegetables and fruits are related to the length of days of hospitalization. The results of this study are consistent with Iswanto's (2013) study indicating that there is no significant relationship between the rest of main foods, animal side dishes, vegetable side dishes, vegetables and fruits against patient duration. This can be due to other factors that are more influential such as the intake of food from outside the hospital as according to research of Komalawati (2005) indicating that the existence of food outside the hospital consumed will make the patient feel full and not consume the food provided by the hospital.
The results of Rizani's research (2013) from the results of interviews about the reasons for not spending the food, some patients say that the appetite is good, but because of the food from outside the hospital obtained from the family making the food served by the hospital is not consumed by the patient. According to Moehyi (1992), food eaten from outside the hospital will affect the occurrence of food leftovers. Hunger that is not immediately addressed in a patient under treatment leads patients to seek additional food from outside the hospital so that the food coming from the hospital is not consumed.
Table4. Furthermore, Fisher's Exact Test proves there is a significant relationship between the rest of main food, animal side dishes and vegetables to the cost of food leftovers (p-value < 0.05) while other types are not related.
The presence of food waste indicates the inefficiency of the management in implementing the food system. The food cost analysis is one way to evaluate the nutritional services provided in order to further improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the food administration system in the hospital (Arieffuddin, 2009).
The more the amount of food left and the higher the price of the food, the cost of the food will also increase. The possibility of this is due to the large unit price of foodstuffs and the amount of food lost, both from food leftovers and the mismatch of the weight of the respondent's soft food portion (Ariefuddin, 2009).
In this study, the leftovers of the vegetable side dish shows no significant relationship. This is probably due to the cheaper price of vegetable side dishes than the price of other foodstuffs. As the results of Djamaluddin et. al (2005) which states that the cost of filed up staple food, vegetable and vegetable side dishes are cheaper than a few animal and fruit side dishes leftovers as the price of main food, vegetable and vegetable side dishes are cheaper than the price of animal and fruit side dishes.
In this study the total cost of meal per person lost in a day is Rp 1.871,92, - or 16.25% of the average daily lunch price per person is Rp 11.522, -. Although the percentage of lost food costs is still below 25% of the average food prices, but this still illustrates the budget meal which is less efficient. The results of this study are not much different from the results of Ariefuddin et. al (2009) obtaining the average cost of daily food remnants per person is Rp. 1.597,64, -. When compared with other studies, this is in line with the Iswanto (2013) which shows that there is no relationship between the rest of the vegetable side dishes with the average cost of the respondent during the treatment. For the rest of the staple food, animal side dishes, vegetables and fruits are not in line with the results of these studies. This may due to the different geograpic location that may affect the taste of food consumed during being treated in hospital.
4. Conclusion
References